PairBook
HomeLAMR › LAMR vs VNQ

LAMR vs VNQ: Correlation

Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.63.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.63
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.61
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.69
long-run
Ann. covariance
256.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LAMR and VNQ?

On 3 years of weekly data the LAMR/VNQ correlation comes out at 0.63, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.61) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.69, and annualized covariance runs at 256.5 %².

Among the 14 assets we track against LAMR, VNQ ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives LAMR the advantage: +24.0% versus +10.3%, a 13.7-point spread.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LAMR vs VNQ: side by side

LAMR (Lamar Advertising Company)VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF)
1-year return+24.0%+10.3%
5-year return+68.6%+9.5%
Volatility (ann.)24.7%16.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.900.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-23.9%-17.5%
Market cap$15.3B
P/E (trailing)27.5
Dividend yield4.15%3.51%
Expense ratio0.13%
Assets under management$73.1B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · Real Estate
Higher yield: LAMR 4.15% vs 3.51%Smaller drawdown: VNQ -17.5% vs -23.9%Higher 5y return: LAMR +68.6% vs +9.5%

VNQ is a Real Estate fund from Vanguard: $73.1B under management, 140 holdings, a 0.13% expense ratio, a 3.51% trailing dividend yield.

-7%0%+33%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LAMR · VNQ

Year-by-year returns

YearLAMRVNQ
2022-18.0%-26.3%
2023+18.6%+11.9%
2024+20.0%+4.8%
2025+9.7%+3.2%
2026+21.7%+12.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

LAMR represents 0.72% of VNQ's portfolio, so part of any move in VNQ is LAMR itself, and the correlation between them is partly mechanical.

Are LAMR and VNQ good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.63 means LAMR and VNQ share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LAMR and VNQ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LAMR and VNQ is 0.63 over 3 years, 0.61 over 1 year and 0.69 over 5 years.

Is VNQ a good diversifier for LAMR?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.63 means LAMR and VNQ share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.63 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.63 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lamr-vs-vnq.json

LAMR vs VNQ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.63LAMR vs VNQ0.63

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LAMR vs VNQ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lamr-vs-vnq.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lamr-vs-vnq/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LAMR correlations · VNQ correlations