PairBook
HomeLAES › LAES vs OMC

LAES vs OMC: Correlation

SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and Omnicom Group (OMC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.18.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.06
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1345.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LAES and OMC?

Over the past 3 years, LAES and OMC moved with a correlation of -0.18, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.06) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.18). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1345.2 %².

Within LAES's tracked universe of 26 assets, OMC comes in at #19 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: OMC led by 20.9 percentage points, -4.4% for LAES against +16.5% for OMC. Note the risk asymmetry: LAES runs 9.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LAES vs OMC: side by side

LAES (SEALSQ Corp)OMC (Omnicom Group)
1-year return-4.4%+16.5%
5-year returnn/a+45.6%
Volatility (ann.)261.5%28.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.570.76
Max drawdown (3Y)-94.5%-33.3%
Market cap$0.6B$24.1B
P/E (trailing)237.5
Dividend yield0.00%3.53%
Sector / categoryUS ListedCommunication Services
Higher yield: OMC 3.53% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: OMC -33.3% vs -94.5%
-18%0%+189%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LAES · OMC

Year-by-year returns

YearLAESOMC
2022+15.7%
2023+9.6%
2024+380.5%+2.5%
2025-38.5%-2.6%
2026-31.0%+11.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LAES and OMC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.18 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LAES and OMC?

The LAES/OMC correlation stands at -0.18 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.06, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is OMC a good diversifier for LAES?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.18 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.18 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/laes-vs-omc.json

LAES vs OMC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18LAES vs OMC-0.18

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LAES vs OMC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/laes-vs-omc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/laes-vs-omc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LAES correlations · OMC correlations