PairBook
HomeLAB › LAB vs RGP

LAB vs RGP: Correlation

How closely do Standard BioTools Inc. (LAB) and Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.43, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.43
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
1156.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LAB and RGP?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LAB and RGP correlate at 0.43, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.43 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.27, with an annualized covariance of 1156.7 %².

In LAB's tracked universe of 11 assets, RGP sits right near the top at #3. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RGP outperformed by 38.9 percentage points (-49.0% for LAB against -10.1% for RGP). Note the risk asymmetry: LAB runs 1.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LAB vs RGP: side by side

LAB (Standard BioTools Inc.)RGP (Resources Connection, Inc.)
1-year return-49.0%-10.1%
5-year return-90.9%-66.0%
Volatility (ann.)69.2%38.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.551.20
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.7%-74.7%
Market cap$0.3B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%6.67%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: RGP 6.67% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RGP -74.7% vs -78.7%Higher 5y return: RGP -66.0% vs -90.9%
-50%0%+25%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LAB · RGP

Year-by-year returns

YearLABRGP
2022-70.2%+6.3%
2023+88.9%-20.1%
2024-20.8%-36.5%
2025-26.9%-37.3%
2026-49.0%-12.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LAB and RGP good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.43, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LAB and RGP?

The LAB/RGP correlation stands at 0.43 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.43, 5 years: 0.27), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RGP a good diversifier for LAB?

A fair diversifier. At 0.43, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.43 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lab-vs-rgp.json

LAB vs RGP: 3-year weekly correlation 0.43LAB vs RGP0.43

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LAB vs RGP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lab-vs-rgp.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lab-vs-rgp/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LAB correlations · RGP correlations