PairBook
HomeL › L vs RKTO

L vs RKTO: Correlation

Loews Corporation (L) and Rocket One Inc. (RKTO) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-533.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are L and RKTO?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of L and RKTO correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.33) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.06, with an annualized covariance of -533.4 %².

Out of 54 assets tracked against L, RKTO lands near the bottom at #51. The last year tells two different stories: L led by 54.5 percentage points, +14.2% for L against -40.3% for RKTO. Risk is not evenly split, since RKTO carries 8.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

L vs RKTO: side by side

L (Loews Corporation)RKTO (Rocket One Inc.)
1-year return+14.2%-40.3%
5-year return+100.1%-97.7%
Volatility (ann.)16.6%135.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.330.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-12.2%-81.1%
Market cap$22.5B
P/E (trailing)13.5
Dividend yield0.23%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: L 0.23% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: L -12.2% vs -81.1%Higher 5y return: L +100.1% vs -97.7%
-61%0%+35%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. L · RKTO

Year-by-year returns

YearLRKTO
2022+1.4%-52.7%
2023+19.8%-81.5%
2024+22.1%-48.1%
2025+24.7%+32.4%
2026+4.5%-27.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are L and RKTO good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between L and RKTO?

The L/RKTO correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.33, 5 years: -0.06), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RKTO a good diversifier for L?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/l-vs-rkto.json

L vs RKTO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24L vs RKTO-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![L vs RKTO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/l-vs-rkto.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/l-vs-rkto/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: L correlations · RKTO correlations