PairBook
HomeKPLT › KPLT vs VXZ

KPLT vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.28, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.37
long-run
Ann. covariance
-623.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are KPLT and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of KPLT and VXZ correlate at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.12) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.28). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.37, with an annualized covariance of -623.4 %².

Out of 11 assets tracked against KPLT, VXZ lands near the bottom at #10. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VXZ outperformed by 42.9 percentage points (-59.0% for KPLT against -16.1% for VXZ). Risk is not evenly split, since KPLT carries 3.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

KPLT vs VXZ: side by side

KPLT (Katapult Holdings, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-59.0%-16.1%
5-year return-95.6%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)87.1%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.08-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-75.6%-36.4%
Market cap$0.5B
P/E (trailing)3.1
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -75.6%Higher 5y return: VXZ -53.1% vs -95.6%
-73%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. KPLT · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearKPLTVXZ
2022-71.6%+0.5%
2023-54.5%-44.0%
2024-37.9%-12.7%
2025-4.5%+5.7%
2026-12.4%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are KPLT and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between KPLT and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.28 over 3 years, with -0.12 over the last year and -0.37 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for KPLT?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.28 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/kplt-vs-vxz.json

KPLT vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28KPLT vs VXZ-0.28

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![KPLT vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/kplt-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/kplt-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: KPLT correlations · VXZ correlations