PairBook
HomeKMI › KMI vs PBK

KMI vs PBK: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Kinder Morgan (KMI) and PowerBank Corporation (PBK) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-465.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are KMI and PBK?

Over the past 3 years, KMI and PBK moved with a correlation of -0.21, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.34 versus -0.21 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -465.4 %².

Within KMI's tracked universe of 33 assets, PBK comes in at #26 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months KMI outperformed by 101.0 percentage points (+22.3% for KMI against -78.7% for PBK). Risk is not evenly split, since PBK carries 4.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

KMI vs PBK: side by side

KMI (Kinder Morgan)PBK (PowerBank Corporation)
1-year return+22.3%-78.7%
5-year return+153.0%n/a
Volatility (ann.)22.1%96.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.290.19
Max drawdown (3Y)-18.4%-93.7%
Market cap$70.2B
P/E (trailing)20.6
Dividend yield3.69%0.00%
Sector / categoryEnergyUS Listed
Higher yield: KMI 3.69% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: KMI -18.4% vs -93.7%
-78%0%+31%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. KMI · PBK

Year-by-year returns

YearKMIPBK
2022+21.2%
2023+4.1%
2024+64.4%
2025+4.8%-11.7%
2026+18.0%-75.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are KMI and PBK good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, KMI and PBK have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between KMI and PBK?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with -0.34 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is PBK a good diversifier for KMI?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, KMI and PBK have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/kmi-vs-pbk.json

KMI vs PBK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21KMI vs PBK-0.21

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![KMI vs PBK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/kmi-vs-pbk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/kmi-vs-pbk/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: KMI correlations · PBK correlations