KLRS vs NAKA: Correlation
Kalaris Therapeutics, Inc. (KLRS) and Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are KLRS and NAKA?
On 3 years of weekly data the KLRS/NAKA correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.15 over 1 year against -0.21 over 3. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -4701.9 %².
Among the 15 assets we track against KLRS, NAKA sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. The last year tells two different stories: KLRS led by 130.0 percentage points, +33.1% for KLRS against -96.9% for NAKA. Note the risk asymmetry: NAKA runs 2.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
KLRS vs NAKA: side by side
| KLRS (Kalaris Therapeutics, Inc.) | NAKA (Nakamoto Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +33.1% | -96.9% |
| 5-year return | -99.1% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 98.7% | 231.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.33 | 4.09 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.0% | -99.7% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | KLRS | NAKA |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -60.4% | – |
| 2023 | -86.7% | – |
| 2024 | -38.2% | – |
| 2025 | -12.6% | -71.7% |
| 2026 | -51.4% | -44.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are KLRS and NAKA good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between KLRS and NAKA?
The KLRS/NAKA correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.15, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is NAKA a good diversifier for KLRS?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.21 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/klrs-vs-naka.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/klrs-vs-naka/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: KLRS correlations · NAKA correlations
