KLIC vs TER: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) and Teradyne (TER) carry a correlation of 0.62, a strong link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are KLIC and TER?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of KLIC and TER correlate at 0.62, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.61) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.64, with an annualized covariance of 1429.6 %².
Among the 20 assets we track against KLIC, TER ranks #7 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: TER led by 90.5 percentage points, +128.3% for KLIC against +218.8% for TER.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
KLIC vs TER: side by side
| KLIC (Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.) | TER (Teradyne) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +128.3% | +218.8% |
| 5-year return | +30.7% | +207.9% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 43.9% | 52.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.49 | 1.70 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -49.3% | -58.2% |
| Market cap | $4.4B | $58.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | 38.8 | 50.0 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 0.14% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Information Technology |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | KLIC | TER |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -25.8% | -46.3% |
| 2023 | +25.5% | +24.8% |
| 2024 | -13.2% | +16.5% |
| 2025 | -0.3% | +54.4% |
| 2026 | +86.8% | +92.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are KLIC and TER good diversifiers for each other?
To a limited degree. At 0.62 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
FAQ
What is the correlation between KLIC and TER?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between KLIC and TER is 0.62 over 3 years, 0.61 over 1 year and 0.64 over 5 years.
Is TER a good diversifier for KLIC?
To a limited degree. At 0.62 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
What does a correlation of 0.62 mean?
A reading of 0.62 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/klic-vs-ter.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/klic-vs-ter/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: KLIC correlations · TER correlations
