PairBook
HomeKLAC › KLAC vs MTUM

KLAC vs MTUM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, KLA Corporation (KLAC) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) carry a correlation of 0.71, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.71
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.70
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.66
long-run
Ann. covariance
667.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are KLAC and MTUM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of KLAC and MTUM correlate at 0.71, strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.70 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.66, with an annualized covariance of 667.0 %².

Among the 40 assets we track against KLAC, MTUM ranks #13 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with KLAC ahead by 82.7 points (+107.9% versus +25.2%). Do not treat this figure as fixed: across three years the rolling one-year correlation ranged all the way from 0.32 to 0.86. One caveat on sizing: KLAC is 2.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

KLAC vs MTUM: side by side

KLAC (KLA Corporation)MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF)
1-year return+107.9%+25.2%
5-year return+463.9%+76.1%
Volatility (ann.)45.6%20.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.841.25
Max drawdown (3Y)-43.6%-21.0%
Market cap$240.1B
P/E (trailing)50.2
Dividend yield0.44%0.62%
Expense ratio0.15%
Assets under management$25.3B
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyETF · US Style
Higher yield: MTUM 0.62% vs 0.44%Smaller drawdown: MTUM -21.0% vs -43.6%Higher 5y return: KLAC +463.9% vs +76.1%

MTUM is a Large Blend fund from iShares: $25.3B under management, 126 holdings, a 0.15% expense ratio, a 0.62% trailing dividend yield.

-3%0%+188%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. KLAC · MTUM

Year-by-year returns

YearKLACMTUM
2022-11.2%-18.3%
2023+56.0%+9.1%
2024+9.4%+32.9%
2025+94.5%+22.1%
2026+51.8%+21.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

A structural note: 1.51% of MTUM is KLAC itself, so the fund partly moves with the stock by construction.

Are KLAC and MTUM good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.71 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between KLAC and MTUM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between KLAC and MTUM is 0.71 over 3 years, 0.70 over 1 year and 0.66 over 5 years.

Is MTUM a good diversifier for KLAC?

To a limited degree. At 0.71 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.71 mean?

A reading of 0.71 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/klac-vs-mtum.json

KLAC vs MTUM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.71KLAC vs MTUM0.71

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![KLAC vs MTUM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/klac-vs-mtum.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/klac-vs-mtum/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: KLAC correlations · MTUM correlations