KITT vs SFBC: Correlation
Nauticus Robotics, Inc. (KITT) and Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. (SFBC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are KITT and SFBC?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of KITT and SFBC correlate at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.10 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.18, with an annualized covariance of -568.7 %².
Out of 14 assets tracked against KITT, SFBC lands near the bottom at #13. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SFBC ahead by 99.3 points (-98.9% versus +0.4%). Risk is not evenly split, since KITT carries 6.0 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
KITT vs SFBC: side by side
| KITT (Nauticus Robotics, Inc.) | SFBC (Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -98.9% | +0.4% |
| 5-year return | -100.0% | +19.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 133.4% | 22.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.50 | 0.17 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -100.0% | -24.7% |
| Market cap | – | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 15.2 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.69% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | KITT | SFBC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -62.4% | -9.0% |
| 2023 | -81.9% | +1.3% |
| 2024 | -93.6% | +37.4% |
| 2025 | -94.5% | -15.8% |
| 2026 | -87.0% | +10.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are KITT and SFBC good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between KITT and SFBC?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.10 over the last year and -0.18 over 5 years.
Is SFBC a good diversifier for KITT?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/kitt-vs-sfbc.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/kitt-vs-sfbc/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: KITT correlations · SFBC correlations
