PairBook
HomeJNJ › JNJ vs ZCMD

JNJ vs ZCMD: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Zhongchao Inc. - Class A (ZCMD) carry a correlation of -0.24, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
-621.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are JNJ and ZCMD?

Over the past 3 years, JNJ and ZCMD moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.22 over 1 year against -0.24 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.18, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -621.0 %².

Out of 48 assets tracked against JNJ, ZCMD lands near the bottom at #44. The last year tells two different stories: JNJ led by 153.6 percentage points, +53.7% for JNJ against -99.9% for ZCMD. Risk is not evenly split, since ZCMD carries 7.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

JNJ vs ZCMD: side by side

JNJ (Johnson & Johnson)ZCMD (Zhongchao Inc. - Class A)
1-year return+53.7%-99.9%
5-year return+76.0%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)18.5%141.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.050.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-14.4%-100.0%
Market cap$640.5B
P/E (trailing)30.9
Dividend yield1.94%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Higher yield: JNJ 1.94% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: JNJ -14.4% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: JNJ +76.0% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+54%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). JNJ · ZCMD

Year-by-year returns

YearJNJZCMD
2022+6.0%-35.4%
2023-8.6%-69.5%
2024-4.8%-53.8%
2025+47.5%-72.2%
2026+30.5%-99.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are JNJ and ZCMD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between JNJ and ZCMD?

The JNJ/ZCMD correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.22, 5 years: -0.18), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ZCMD a good diversifier for JNJ?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/jnj-vs-zcmd.json

JNJ vs ZCMD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24JNJ vs ZCMD-0.24

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![JNJ vs ZCMD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/jnj-vs-zcmd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/jnj-vs-zcmd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: JNJ correlations · ZCMD correlations