PairBook
HomeJBHT › JBHT vs ZCMD

JBHT vs ZCMD: Correlation

J.B. Hunt (JBHT) and Zhongchao Inc. - Class A (ZCMD) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.18.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.21
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-779.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are JBHT and ZCMD?

On 3 years of weekly data the JBHT/ZCMD correlation comes out at -0.18, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.21 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.12, and annualized covariance runs at -779.4 %².

Among the 36 assets we track against JBHT, ZCMD ranks #31 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: JBHT led by 182.0 percentage points, +82.1% for JBHT against -99.9% for ZCMD. Note the risk asymmetry: ZCMD runs 4.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

JBHT vs ZCMD: side by side

JBHT (J.B. Hunt)ZCMD (Zhongchao Inc. - Class A)
1-year return+82.1%-99.9%
5-year return+51.0%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)30.0%141.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.930.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.4%-100.0%
Market cap$24.7B
P/E (trailing)37.5
Dividend yield0.68%0.00%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Higher yield: JBHT 0.68% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: JBHT -42.4% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: JBHT +51.0% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+104%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). JBHT · ZCMD

Year-by-year returns

YearJBHTZCMD
2022-13.9%-35.4%
2023+15.6%-69.5%
2024-13.8%-53.8%
2025+15.2%-72.2%
2026+36.3%-99.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are JBHT and ZCMD good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.18 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between JBHT and ZCMD?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between JBHT and ZCMD is -0.18 over 3 years, -0.21 over 1 year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is ZCMD a good diversifier for JBHT?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.18 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/jbht-vs-zcmd.json

JBHT vs ZCMD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18JBHT vs ZCMD-0.18

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![JBHT vs ZCMD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/jbht-vs-zcmd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/jbht-vs-zcmd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: JBHT correlations · ZCMD correlations