J vs LANV: Correlation
How closely do Jacobs Solutions (J) and Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.16, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are J and LANV?
On 3 years of weekly data the J/LANV correlation comes out at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.14 over 1 year against -0.16 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.13, and annualized covariance runs at -292.2 %².
Within J's tracked universe of 34 assets, LANV comes in at #25 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: J led by 53.1 percentage points, +2.6% for J against -50.5% for LANV. One caveat on sizing: LANV is 2.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
J vs LANV: side by side
| J (Jacobs Solutions) | LANV (Lanvin Group Holdings Limited) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +2.6% | -50.5% |
| 5-year return | +40.5% | -89.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 25.7% | 69.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.77 | -0.15 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -34.4% | -78.6% |
| Market cap | $17.6B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 49.9 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Industrials | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | J | LANV |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -13.1% | -6.1% |
| 2023 | +9.0% | -67.7% |
| 2024 | +24.2% | -31.9% |
| 2025 | +1.1% | +0.0% |
| 2026 | +14.6% | -50.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are J and LANV good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between J and LANV?
The J/LANV correlation stands at -0.16 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.14, 5 years: -0.13), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is LANV a good diversifier for J?
Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?
A reading of -0.16 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/j-vs-lanv.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/j-vs-lanv/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: J correlations · LANV correlations
