PairBook
HomeIWM › IWM vs SBH

IWM vs SBH: Correlation

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. Commo (SBH) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.54.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.54
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.69
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.54
long-run
Ann. covariance
484.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IWM and SBH?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of IWM and SBH correlate at 0.54, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.69) than the 3-year average (0.54). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.54, with an annualized covariance of 484.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, SBH places #183 of the 320 assets tracked against IWM. On 12-month performance IWM holds a 11.9-point edge, +28.4% against +16.5%. Risk is not evenly split, since SBH carries 2.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IWM vs SBH: side by side

IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF)SBH (Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. Commo)
1-year return+28.4%+16.5%
5-year return+41.5%-12.3%
Volatility (ann.)19.8%45.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.061.15
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.5%-45.2%
Market cap$1.5B
P/E (trailing)8.6
Dividend yield0.91%0.00%
Expense ratio0.19%
Assets under management$80.1B
Sector / categoryETF · US Small & Mid CapUS Listed
Higher yield: IWM 0.91% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: IWM -27.5% vs -45.2%Higher 5y return: IWM +41.5% vs -12.3%

IWM, iShares's Small Blend fund, carries $80.1B under management, 1757 holdings, a 0.19% expense ratio, a 0.91% trailing dividend yield.

-18%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). IWM · SBH

Year-by-year returns

YearIWMSBH
2022-20.5%-32.2%
2023+16.8%+6.1%
2024+11.4%-21.3%
2025+12.7%+36.5%
2026+22.3%+15.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

Keep in mind that IWM holds SBH at a 0.05% weight, which makes a slice of this correlation mechanical rather than coincidental.

Are IWM and SBH good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.54 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IWM and SBH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.54 over 3 years, with 0.69 over the last year and 0.54 over 5 years.

Is SBH a good diversifier for IWM?

To a limited degree. At 0.54 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.54 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iwm-vs-sbh.json

IWM vs SBH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.54IWM vs SBH0.54

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![IWM vs SBH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iwm-vs-sbh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iwm-vs-sbh/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IWM correlations · SBH correlations