IWM vs RLGT: Correlation
iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.63.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are IWM and RLGT?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of IWM and RLGT correlate at 0.63, strong. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.52 versus 0.63 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.56, with an annualized covariance of 389.7 %².
By 3-year correlation, RLGT places #86 of the 320 assets tracked against IWM. Over the last 12 months RLGT came out ahead by 6.4 percentage points (+28.4% against +34.8%). Note the risk asymmetry: RLGT runs 1.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
IWM vs RLGT: side by side
| IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) | RLGT (Radiant Logistics, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +28.4% | +34.8% |
| 5-year return | +41.5% | +31.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 19.8% | 31.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.06 | 0.98 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -27.5% | -29.3% |
| Market cap | – | $0.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 25.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 0.00% |
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | – |
| Assets under management | $80.1B | – |
| Sector / category | ETF · US Small & Mid Cap | US Listed |
On the fund side, IWM sits in the Small Blend category at iShares, with $80.1B under management, 1757 holdings, a 0.19% expense ratio, a 0.91% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | IWM | RLGT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -20.5% | -30.2% |
| 2023 | +16.8% | +30.5% |
| 2024 | +11.4% | +0.9% |
| 2025 | +12.7% | -5.5% |
| 2026 | +22.3% | +37.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are IWM and RLGT good diversifiers for each other?
To a limited degree. At 0.63 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
FAQ
What is the correlation between IWM and RLGT?
The IWM/RLGT correlation stands at 0.63 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.52, 5 years: 0.56), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is RLGT a good diversifier for IWM?
To a limited degree. At 0.63 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
What does a correlation of 0.63 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.63 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iwm-vs-rlgt.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iwm-vs-rlgt/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: IWM correlations · RLGT correlations
