PairBook
HomeIWM › IWM vs KWR

IWM vs KWR: Correlation

How closely do iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Quaker Houghton (KWR) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.67, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.67
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.63
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.70
long-run
Ann. covariance
457.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IWM and KWR?

On 3 years of weekly data the IWM/KWR correlation comes out at 0.67, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.63 over 1 year against 0.67 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.70, and annualized covariance runs at 457.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, KWR places #57 of the 320 assets tracked against IWM. The trailing year gives IWM the advantage: +28.4% versus +15.1%, a 13.3-point spread. One caveat on sizing: KWR is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IWM vs KWR: side by side

IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF)KWR (Quaker Houghton)
1-year return+28.4%+15.1%
5-year return+41.5%-32.5%
Volatility (ann.)19.8%34.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.061.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.5%-55.3%
Market cap$2.8B
P/E (trailing)29.4
Dividend yield0.91%1.24%
Expense ratio0.19%
Assets under management$80.1B
Sector / categoryETF · US Small & Mid CapUS Listed
Higher yield: KWR 1.24% vs 0.91%Smaller drawdown: IWM -27.5% vs -55.3%Higher 5y return: IWM +41.5% vs -32.5%

IWM, iShares's Small Blend fund, carries $80.1B under management, 1757 holdings, a 0.19% expense ratio, a 0.91% trailing dividend yield.

-20%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. IWM · KWR

Year-by-year returns

YearIWMKWR
2022-20.5%-26.9%
2023+16.8%+29.1%
2024+11.4%-33.4%
2025+12.7%-0.8%
2026+22.3%+20.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

A structural note: 0.07% of IWM is KWR itself, so the fund partly moves with the stock by construction.

Are IWM and KWR good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.67 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IWM and KWR?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.67 over 3 years, with 0.63 over the last year and 0.70 over 5 years.

Is KWR a good diversifier for IWM?

To a limited degree. At 0.67 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.67 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.67 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iwm-vs-kwr.json

IWM vs KWR: 3-year weekly correlation 0.67IWM vs KWR0.67

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![IWM vs KWR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iwm-vs-kwr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iwm-vs-kwr/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IWM correlations · KWR correlations