PairBook
HomeIWM › IWM vs KE

IWM vs KE: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) carry a correlation of 0.57, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.57
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.50
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.56
long-run
Ann. covariance
473.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IWM and KE?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of IWM and KE correlate at 0.57, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.50 over 1 year against 0.57 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.56, with an annualized covariance of 473.0 %².

Among the 320 assets we track against IWM, KE ranks #151 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months IWM outperformed by 43.4 percentage points (+28.4% for IWM against -15.0% for KE). Risk is not evenly split, since KE carries 2.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IWM vs KE: side by side

IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF)KE (Kimball Electronics, Inc.)
1-year return+28.4%-15.0%
5-year return+41.5%+0.6%
Volatility (ann.)19.8%42.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.061.22
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.5%-58.5%
Market cap$0.6B
P/E (trailing)21.3
Dividend yield0.91%0.00%
Expense ratio0.19%
Assets under management$80.1B
Sector / categoryETF · US Small & Mid CapUS Listed
Higher yield: IWM 0.91% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: IWM -27.5% vs -58.5%Higher 5y return: IWM +41.5% vs +0.6%

IWM, iShares's Small Blend fund, carries $80.1B under management, 1757 holdings, a 0.19% expense ratio, a 0.91% trailing dividend yield.

-24%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). IWM · KE

Year-by-year returns

YearIWMKE
2022-20.5%+3.8%
2023+16.8%+19.3%
2024+11.4%-30.5%
2025+12.7%+48.5%
2026+22.3%-13.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IWM and KE good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.57 means IWM and KE share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IWM and KE?

The IWM/KE correlation stands at 0.57 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.50, 5 years: 0.56), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is KE a good diversifier for IWM?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.57 means IWM and KE share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.57 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.57 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iwm-vs-ke.json

IWM vs KE: 3-year weekly correlation 0.57IWM vs KE0.57

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![IWM vs KE correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iwm-vs-ke.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iwm-vs-ke/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IWM correlations · KE correlations