PairBook
HomeIVF › IVF vs SILC

IVF vs SILC: Correlation

How closely do INVO Fertility, Inc. (IVF) and Silicom Ltd (SILC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.23, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1873.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IVF and SILC?

Over the past 3 years, IVF and SILC moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.04) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.23). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.09, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1873.0 %².

Out of 14 assets tracked against IVF, SILC lands near the bottom at #11. The last year tells two different stories: SILC led by 290.6 percentage points, -97.5% for IVF against +193.1% for SILC. Note the risk asymmetry: IVF runs 2.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IVF vs SILC: side by side

IVF (INVO Fertility, Inc.)SILC (Silicom Ltd)
1-year return-97.5%+193.1%
5-year return-100.0%+6.1%
Volatility (ann.)150.4%54.8%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.550.98
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-56.5%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)0.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: SILC -56.5% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: SILC +6.1% vs -100.0%
-97%0%+195%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. IVF · SILC

Year-by-year returns

YearIVFSILC
2022-87.3%-18.3%
2023-84.1%-57.1%
2024-40.0%-9.9%
2025-99.7%-9.9%
2026-72.6%+224.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IVF and SILC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IVF and SILC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between IVF and SILC is -0.23 over 3 years, -0.04 over 1 year and -0.09 over 5 years.

Is SILC a good diversifier for IVF?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ivf-vs-silc.json

IVF vs SILC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23IVF vs SILC-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![IVF vs SILC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ivf-vs-silc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ivf-vs-silc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IVF correlations · SILC correlations