PairBook
HomeIRM › IRM vs LICN

IRM vs LICN: Correlation

Iron Mountain (IRM) and Lichen International Limited - Class A (LICN) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-49032.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IRM and LICN?

Over the past 3 years, IRM and LICN moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.04) than the 3-year average (-0.19). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -49032.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, LICN places #26 of the 31 assets tracked against IRM. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with IRM ahead by 112.8 points (+38.1% versus -74.7%). Note the risk asymmetry: LICN runs 276.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IRM vs LICN: side by side

IRM (Iron Mountain)LICN (Lichen International Limited - Class A)
1-year return+38.1%-74.7%
5-year return+219.3%n/a
Volatility (ann.)30.8%8528.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.96-80.22
Max drawdown (3Y)-39.0%-98.4%
Market cap$36.5B
P/E (trailing)86.4
Dividend yield2.78%0.00%
Sector / categoryReal EstateUS Listed
Higher yield: IRM 2.78% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: IRM -39.0% vs -98.4%
-81%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). IRM · LICN

Year-by-year returns

YearIRMLICN
2022-0.1%
2023+46.5%
2024+54.5%-91.0%
2025-18.2%+1484.3%
2026+50.1%-56.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IRM and LICN good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IRM and LICN?

The IRM/LICN correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.04, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LICN a good diversifier for IRM?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/irm-vs-licn.json

IRM vs LICN: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19IRM vs LICN-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![IRM vs LICN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/irm-vs-licn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/irm-vs-licn/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IRM correlations · LICN correlations