PairBook
HomeINVH › INVH vs ZCMD

INVH vs ZCMD: Correlation

Invitation Homes (INVH) and Zhongchao Inc. - Class A (ZCMD) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-574.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are INVH and ZCMD?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of INVH and ZCMD correlate at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.25 over 1 year against -0.19 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.14, with an annualized covariance of -574.5 %².

Within INVH's tracked universe of 28 assets, ZCMD comes in at #23 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with INVH ahead by 98.0 points (-1.9% versus -99.9%). Note the risk asymmetry: ZCMD runs 6.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

INVH vs ZCMD: side by side

INVH (Invitation Homes)ZCMD (Zhongchao Inc. - Class A)
1-year return-1.9%-99.9%
5-year return-16.8%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)21.2%141.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.500.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-30.9%-100.0%
Market cap$17.4B
P/E (trailing)27.3
Dividend yield3.98%0.00%
Sector / categoryReal EstateUS Listed
Higher yield: INVH 3.98% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: INVH -30.9% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: INVH -16.8% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). INVH · ZCMD

Year-by-year returns

YearINVHZCMD
2022-33.0%-35.4%
2023+19.7%-69.5%
2024-3.1%-53.8%
2025-9.7%-72.2%
2026+7.6%-99.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are INVH and ZCMD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, INVH and ZCMD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between INVH and ZCMD?

The INVH/ZCMD correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.25, 5 years: -0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ZCMD a good diversifier for INVH?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, INVH and ZCMD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/invh-vs-zcmd.json

INVH vs ZCMD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19INVH vs ZCMD-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![INVH vs ZCMD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/invh-vs-zcmd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/invh-vs-zcmd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: INVH correlations · ZCMD correlations