PairBook
HomeINV › INV vs LMT

INV vs LMT: Correlation

How closely do Innventure, Inc. (INV) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.16
long-run
Ann. covariance
-475.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are INV and LMT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of INV and LMT correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.39) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.20). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.16, with an annualized covariance of -475.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, LMT places #10 of the 16 assets tracked against INV. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LMT ahead by 97.3 points (-69.4% versus +27.9%). One caveat on sizing: INV is 3.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

INV vs LMT: side by side

INV (Innventure, Inc.)LMT (Lockheed Martin)
1-year return-69.4%+27.9%
5-year return-85.4%+78.9%
Volatility (ann.)90.9%26.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.310.20
Max drawdown (3Y)-90.4%-31.8%
Market cap$0.1B$130.6B
P/E (trailing)20.9
Dividend yield0.00%2.41%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: LMT 2.41% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LMT -31.8% vs -90.4%Higher 5y return: LMT +78.9% vs -85.4%
-74%0%+47%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. INV · LMT

Year-by-year returns

YearINVLMT
2022+1.1%+40.5%
2023+7.3%-4.3%
2024+27.8%+10.0%
2025-69.8%+2.5%
2026-65.1%+18.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are INV and LMT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between INV and LMT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between INV and LMT is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.39 over 1 year and -0.16 over 5 years.

Is LMT a good diversifier for INV?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/inv-vs-lmt.json

INV vs LMT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20INV vs LMT-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![INV vs LMT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/inv-vs-lmt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/inv-vs-lmt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: INV correlations · LMT correlations