INTT vs KLIC: Correlation
inTest Corporation (INTT) and Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.50.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are INTT and KLIC?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of INTT and KLIC correlate at 0.50, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.46) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.49, with an annualized covariance of 1134.3 %².
Within INTT's tracked universe of 12 assets, KLIC comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: KLIC led by 65.9 percentage points, +62.4% for INTT against +128.3% for KLIC.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
INTT vs KLIC: side by side
| INTT (inTest Corporation) | KLIC (Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +62.4% | +128.3% |
| 5-year return | -9.0% | +30.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 51.5% | 43.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.19 | 1.49 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -67.7% | -49.3% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $4.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | 165.4 | 38.8 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.97% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | INTT | KLIC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -19.0% | -25.8% |
| 2023 | +32.0% | +25.5% |
| 2024 | -36.8% | -13.2% |
| 2025 | -13.0% | -0.3% |
| 2026 | +55.0% | +86.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are INTT and KLIC good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.50 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between INTT and KLIC?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.50 over 3 years, with 0.46 over the last year and 0.49 over 5 years.
Is KLIC a good diversifier for INTT?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.50 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.50 mean?
A reading of 0.50 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/intt-vs-klic.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/intt-vs-klic/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: INTT correlations · KLIC correlations
