PairBook
HomeINTC › INTC vs MRAM

INTC vs MRAM: Correlation

Intel (INTC) and Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.43.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.43
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
1899.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are INTC and MRAM?

On 3 years of weekly data the INTC/MRAM correlation comes out at 0.43, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.47) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.35, and annualized covariance runs at 1899.5 %².

Among the 37 assets we track against INTC, MRAM ranks #26 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months INTC outperformed by 97.4 percentage points (+270.6% for INTC against +173.2% for MRAM).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

INTC vs MRAM: side by side

INTC (Intel)MRAM (Everspin Technologies, Inc.)
1-year return+270.6%+173.2%
5-year return+85.4%+134.7%
Volatility (ann.)63.0%69.5%
Beta vs S&P 5002.011.58
Max drawdown (3Y)-63.8%-70.6%
Market cap$486.8B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: INTC -63.8% vs -70.6%Higher 5y return: MRAM +134.7% vs +85.4%
-2%0%+477%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. INTC · MRAM

Year-by-year returns

YearINTCMRAM
2022-46.6%-50.8%
2023+94.6%+62.6%
2024-59.6%-29.3%
2025+84.0%+45.2%
2026+149.6%+88.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are INTC and MRAM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.43 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between INTC and MRAM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.43 over 3 years, with 0.47 over the last year and 0.35 over 5 years.

Is MRAM a good diversifier for INTC?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.43 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.43 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/intc-vs-mram.json

INTC vs MRAM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.43INTC vs MRAM0.43

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![INTC vs MRAM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/intc-vs-mram.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/intc-vs-mram/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: INTC correlations · MRAM correlations