INTA vs PD: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Intapp, Inc. (INTA) and PagerDuty, Inc. (PD) carry a correlation of 0.58, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are INTA and PD?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of INTA and PD correlate at 0.58, moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.69 versus 0.58 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.46, with an annualized covariance of 1690.8 %².
By 3-year correlation, PD places #5 of the 18 assets tracked against INTA. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months INTA outperformed by 17.7 percentage points (-7.8% for INTA against -25.5% for PD).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
INTA vs PD: side by side
| INTA (Intapp, Inc.) | PD (PagerDuty, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -7.8% | -25.5% |
| 5-year return | +24.6% | -70.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 55.5% | 52.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.45 | 1.44 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -74.2% | -78.4% |
| Market cap | $3.3B | $1.0B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 5.9 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | INTA | PD |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -0.9% | -23.6% |
| 2023 | +52.4% | -12.8% |
| 2024 | +68.6% | -21.1% |
| 2025 | -28.5% | -28.2% |
| 2026 | -4.6% | -3.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are INTA and PD good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.58 means INTA and PD share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between INTA and PD?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between INTA and PD is 0.58 over 3 years, 0.69 over 1 year and 0.46 over 5 years.
Is PD a good diversifier for INTA?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.58 means INTA and PD share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.58 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.58 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/inta-vs-pd.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/inta-vs-pd/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: INTA correlations · PD correlations
