PairBook
HomeINKT › INKT vs NMIH

INKT vs NMIH: Correlation

MiNK Therapeutics, Inc. (INKT) and NMI Holdings Inc (NMIH) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.28.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.11
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3164.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are INKT and NMIH?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of INKT and NMIH correlate at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.11 versus -0.28 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.18, with an annualized covariance of -3164.3 %².

Among the 27 assets we track against INKT, NMIH sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #23. The last year tells two different stories: NMIH led by 39.8 percentage points, -26.9% for INKT against +12.9% for NMIH. Note the risk asymmetry: INKT runs 19.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

INKT vs NMIH: side by side

INKT (MiNK Therapeutics, Inc.)NMIH (NMI Holdings Inc)
1-year return-26.9%+12.9%
5-year return-90.3%+99.5%
Volatility (ann.)464.2%24.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.500.55
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.7%-21.4%
Market cap$0.1B$3.4B
P/E (trailing)8.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: NMIH -21.4% vs -86.7%Higher 5y return: NMIH +99.5% vs -90.3%
-36%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. INKT · NMIH

Year-by-year returns

YearINKTNMIH
2022-41.5%-4.3%
2023-59.0%+42.0%
2024-34.9%+23.9%
2025+60.0%+11.0%
2026+4.8%+9.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are INKT and NMIH good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between INKT and NMIH?

The INKT/NMIH correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.11, 5 years: -0.18), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NMIH a good diversifier for INKT?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

A reading of -0.28 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/inkt-vs-nmih.json

INKT vs NMIH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28INKT vs NMIH-0.28

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![INKT vs NMIH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/inkt-vs-nmih.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/inkt-vs-nmih/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: INKT correlations · NMIH correlations