PairBook
HomeING › ING vs VXZ

ING vs VXZ: Correlation

ING Group, N.V. (ING) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.42.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.42
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.64
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.49
long-run
Ann. covariance
-298.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ING and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ING and VXZ correlate at -0.42, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.64) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.42). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.49, with an annualized covariance of -298.5 %².

Out of 16 assets tracked against ING, VXZ lands near the bottom at #15. The last year tells two different stories: ING led by 68.6 percentage points, +52.5% for ING against -16.1% for VXZ.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ING vs VXZ: side by side

ING (ING Group, N.V.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+52.5%-16.1%
5-year return+269.9%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)27.5%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.94-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-19.9%-36.4%
Market cap$100.1B
P/E (trailing)13.2
Dividend yield3.19%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ING -19.9% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: ING +269.9% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+55%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ING · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearINGVXZ
2022-4.2%+0.5%
2023+31.9%-44.0%
2024+12.2%-12.7%
2025+88.3%+5.7%
2026+30.9%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ING and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.42, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ING and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.42 over 3 years, with -0.64 over the last year and -0.49 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for ING?

Yes: at -0.42, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.42 mean?

A reading of -0.42 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ing-vs-vxz.json

ING vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.42ING vs VXZ-0.42

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ING vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ing-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ing-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ING correlations · VXZ correlations