PairBook
HomeIMNN › IMNN vs VIK

IMNN vs VIK: Correlation

Imunon, Inc. (IMNN) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.23.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.06
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1122.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IMNN and VIK?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of IMNN and VIK correlate at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.06) than the 3-year average (-0.23). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -1122.9 %².

Among the 14 assets we track against IMNN, VIK sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VIK outperformed by 116.3 percentage points (-73.6% for IMNN against +42.7% for VIK). Risk is not evenly split, since IMNN carries 4.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IMNN vs VIK: side by side

IMNN (Imunon, Inc.)VIK (Viking Holdings Ltd)
1-year return-73.6%+42.7%
5-year return-99.2%n/a
Volatility (ann.)144.4%33.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.091.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-96.5%-35.4%
Market cap$40.1B
P/E (trailing)30.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VIK -35.4% vs -96.5%
-74%0%+68%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. IMNN · VIK

Year-by-year returns

YearIMNNVIK
2022-83.3%
2023-49.6%
2024+39.7%
2025-69.3%+62.1%
2026-58.0%+25.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IMNN and VIK good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IMNN and VIK?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.23 over 3 years, with 0.06 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is VIK a good diversifier for IMNN?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

A reading of -0.23 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/imnn-vs-vik.json

IMNN vs VIK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23IMNN vs VIK-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![IMNN vs VIK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/imnn-vs-vik.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/imnn-vs-vik/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IMNN correlations · VIK correlations