IMMR vs VTI: Correlation
Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.44.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are IMMR and VTI?
On 3 years of weekly data the IMMR/VTI correlation comes out at 0.44, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.50 over 1 year against 0.44 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.36, and annualized covariance runs at 246.9 %².
Within IMMR's tracked universe of 12 assets, VTI comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. Neither side won the trailing year by much: +16.1% against +20.7%. Note the risk asymmetry: IMMR runs 2.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
IMMR vs VTI: side by side
| IMMR (Immersion Corporation) | VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +16.1% | +20.7% |
| 5-year return | +17.7% | +74.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 38.6% | 14.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.14 | 1.01 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -56.9% | -19.3% |
| Market cap | $0.3B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 55.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 3.12% | 1.06% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.03% |
| Assets under management | – | $2,290.0B |
| Sector / category | US Listed | ETF · US Large Cap |
VTI, Vanguard's Large Blend fund, carries $2,290.0B under management, 3140 holdings, a 0.03% expense ratio, a 1.06% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | IMMR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +23.1% | -19.5% |
| 2023 | +3.4% | +26.0% |
| 2024 | +26.5% | +23.8% |
| 2025 | -18.3% | +17.1% |
| 2026 | +18.6% | +14.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are IMMR and VTI good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.44, IMMR and VTI keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between IMMR and VTI?
The IMMR/VTI correlation stands at 0.44 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.50, 5 years: 0.36), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VTI a good diversifier for IMMR?
Reasonably. At 0.44, IMMR and VTI keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.44 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.44 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/immr-vs-vti.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/immr-vs-vti/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: IMMR correlations · VTI correlations
