PairBook
HomeILMN › ILMN vs VXZ

ILMN vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.29, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.29
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
-335.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ILMN and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the ILMN/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.22 over 1 year against -0.29 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.34, and annualized covariance runs at -335.8 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of ILMN's tracked universe, ranking #9 of 11. The last year tells two different stories: ILMN led by 144.8 percentage points, +128.7% for ILMN against -16.1% for VXZ. Note the risk asymmetry: ILMN runs 1.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ILMN vs VXZ: side by side

ILMN (Illumina, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+128.7%-16.1%
5-year return-48.8%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)45.9%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.22-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-57.1%-36.4%
Market cap$34.4B
P/E (trailing)42.0
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -57.1%Higher 5y return: ILMN -48.8% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+130%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ILMN · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearILMNVXZ
2022-46.9%+0.5%
2023-31.1%-44.0%
2024-1.3%-12.7%
2025-1.8%+5.7%
2026+73.6%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ILMN and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.29, ILMN and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ILMN and VXZ?

The ILMN/VXZ correlation stands at -0.29 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.22, 5 years: -0.34), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for ILMN?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.29, ILMN and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ilmn-vs-vxz.json

ILMN vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.29ILMN vs VXZ-0.29

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ILMN vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ilmn-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ilmn-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ILMN correlations · VXZ correlations