PairBook
HomeIHT › IHT vs MI

IHT vs MI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, InnSuites Hospitality Trust Shares of Beneficial Interest (IHT) and NFT Limited Class A (MI) carry a correlation of 0.29, a weak link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.29
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.57
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
72129.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IHT and MI?

Over the past 3 years, IHT and MI moved with a correlation of 0.29, which is weak. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.57) than the 3-year average (0.29). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.18, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 72129.3 %².

In IHT's tracked universe of 20 assets, MI sits right near the top at #2. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MI outperformed by 23.5 percentage points (-33.8% for IHT against -10.3% for MI). One caveat on sizing: MI is 80.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IHT vs MI: side by side

IHT (InnSuites Hospitality Trust Shares of Beneficial Interest)MI (NFT Limited Class A)
1-year return-33.8%-10.3%
5-year return-63.6%-99.5%
Volatility (ann.)55.0%4443.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.078.21
Max drawdown (3Y)-69.6%-98.5%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield1.44%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: IHT 1.44% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: IHT -69.6% vs -98.5%Higher 5y return: IHT -63.6% vs -99.5%
-94%0%+384%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. IHT · MI

Year-by-year returns

YearIHTMI
2022-22.9%-86.4%
2023+2.3%-66.2%
2024+29.5%-61.9%
2025-37.4%+13.3%
2026-3.6%-28.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IHT and MI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.29 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IHT and MI?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between IHT and MI is 0.29 over 3 years, 0.57 over 1 year and 0.18 over 5 years.

Is MI a good diversifier for IHT?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.29 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.29 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.29 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iht-vs-mi.json

IHT vs MI: 3-year weekly correlation 0.29IHT vs MI0.29

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![IHT vs MI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iht-vs-mi.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iht-vs-mi/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IHT correlations · MI correlations