IFS vs PUK: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) and Prudential Public Limited Company (PUK) carry a correlation of 0.41, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are IFS and PUK?
On 3 years of weekly data the IFS/PUK correlation comes out at 0.41, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.45 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.37, and annualized covariance runs at 350.7 %².
Within IFS's tracked universe of 11 assets, PUK comes in at #4 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months IFS outperformed by 34.0 percentage points (+43.2% for IFS against +9.2% for PUK).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
IFS vs PUK: side by side
| IFS (Intercorp Financial Services Inc.) | PUK (Prudential Public Limited Company) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +43.2% | +9.2% |
| 5-year return | +212.7% | -26.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 30.7% | 28.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.52 | 0.87 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -26.8% | -41.8% |
| Market cap | $6.0B | $34.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | 10.0 | 9.9 |
| Dividend yield | 11.04% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | IFS | PUK |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -5.4% | -19.1% |
| 2023 | -1.5% | -17.0% |
| 2024 | +39.9% | -27.3% |
| 2025 | +49.0% | +99.3% |
| 2026 | +33.6% | -9.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are IFS and PUK good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.41, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between IFS and PUK?
The IFS/PUK correlation stands at 0.41 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.45, 5 years: 0.37), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is PUK a good diversifier for IFS?
A fair diversifier. At 0.41, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.41 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.41 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ifs-vs-puk.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ifs-vs-puk/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: IFS correlations · PUK correlations
