IFN vs VT: Correlation
How closely do Aberdeen India Fund, Inc. (IFN) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.60, which is strong.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are IFN and VT?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of IFN and VT correlate at 0.60, strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.68 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.64, with an annualized covariance of 170.3 %².
By 3-year correlation, VT places #5 of the 12 assets tracked against IFN. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VT outperformed by 36.7 percentage points (-14.0% for IFN against +22.7% for VT).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
IFN vs VT: side by side
| IFN (Aberdeen India Fund, Inc.) | VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -14.0% | +22.7% |
| 5-year return | +1.4% | +67.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 20.3% | 13.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.74 | 0.92 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -33.9% | -16.5% |
| Market cap | $0.5B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 19.23% | 1.59% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.06% |
| Assets under management | – | $97.9B |
| Sector / category | US Listed | ETF · Global |
VT is a Global Large-Stock Blend fund from Vanguard: $97.9B under management, 5308 holdings, a 0.06% expense ratio, a 1.59% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | IFN | VT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -15.8% | -18.0% |
| 2023 | +36.5% | +22.0% |
| 2024 | -2.3% | +16.5% |
| 2025 | -3.0% | +22.4% |
| 2026 | -7.6% | +15.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are IFN and VT good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.60 means IFN and VT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between IFN and VT?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.60 over 3 years, with 0.68 over the last year and 0.64 over 5 years.
Is VT a good diversifier for IFN?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.60 means IFN and VT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.60 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.60 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ifn-vs-vt.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ifn-vs-vt/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: IFN correlations · VT correlations
