PairBook
HomeIFF › IFF vs PED

IFF vs PED: Correlation

International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) and Pedevco Corp. (PED) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.02
long-run
Ann. covariance
-323.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IFF and PED?

On 3 years of weekly data the IFF/PED correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.43) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.20). The 5-year figure is -0.02, and annualized covariance runs at -323.8 %².

Among the 32 assets we track against IFF, PED sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #28. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months IFF outperformed by 20.1 percentage points (+33.2% for IFF against +13.1% for PED). One caveat on sizing: PED is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IFF vs PED: side by side

IFF (International Flavors & Fragrances)PED (Pedevco Corp.)
1-year return+33.2%+13.1%
5-year return-34.3%-39.7%
Volatility (ann.)29.5%54.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.69-0.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.6%-58.3%
Market cap$22.2B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield1.84%0.00%
Sector / categoryMaterialsUS Listed
Higher yield: IFF 1.84% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: IFF -42.6% vs -58.3%Higher 5y return: IFF -34.3% vs -39.7%
-26%0%+48%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. IFF · PED

Year-by-year returns

YearIFFPED
2022-28.3%+3.8%
2023-19.5%-30.0%
2024+6.3%+1.0%
2025-18.4%-28.0%
2026+30.3%+19.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IFF and PED good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IFF and PED?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with -0.43 over the last year and -0.02 over 5 years.

Is PED a good diversifier for IFF?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iff-vs-ped.json

IFF vs PED: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20IFF vs PED-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![IFF vs PED correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iff-vs-ped.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iff-vs-ped/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IFF correlations · PED correlations