PairBook
HomeIFF › IFF vs NRT

IFF vs NRT: Correlation

International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) and North European Oil Royality Trust (NRT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-303.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IFF and NRT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of IFF and NRT correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.36) than the 3-year average (-0.20). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.05, with an annualized covariance of -303.8 %².

Among the 32 assets we track against IFF, NRT ranks #27 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with NRT ahead by 52.0 points (+33.2% versus +85.2%). One caveat on sizing: NRT is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IFF vs NRT: side by side

IFF (International Flavors & Fragrances)NRT (North European Oil Royality Trust)
1-year return+33.2%+85.2%
5-year return-34.3%+131.5%
Volatility (ann.)29.5%51.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.69-0.42
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.6%-66.1%
Market cap$22.2B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)8.4
Dividend yield1.84%11.95%
Sector / categoryMaterialsUS Listed
Higher yield: NRT 11.95% vs 1.84%Smaller drawdown: IFF -42.6% vs -66.1%Higher 5y return: NRT +131.5% vs -34.3%
-9%0%+107%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. IFF · NRT

Year-by-year returns

YearIFFNRT
2022-28.3%+41.9%
2023-19.5%-46.5%
2024+6.3%-25.3%
2025-18.4%+88.4%
2026+30.3%+41.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IFF and NRT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IFF and NRT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between IFF and NRT is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.36 over 1 year and -0.05 over 5 years.

Is NRT a good diversifier for IFF?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iff-vs-nrt.json

IFF vs NRT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20IFF vs NRT-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![IFF vs NRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iff-vs-nrt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iff-vs-nrt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IFF correlations · NRT correlations