IFBD vs LUNR: Correlation
Infobird Co., Ltd (IFBD) and Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.39.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are IFBD and LUNR?
Over the past 3 years, IFBD and LUNR moved with a correlation of 0.39, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.05) runs below the 3-year figure (0.39). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.34, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 6255.6 %².
By 3-year correlation, LUNR places #4 of the 14 assets tracked against IFBD. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LUNR ahead by 92.5 points (-12.5% versus +80.0%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
IFBD vs LUNR: side by side
| IFBD (Infobird Co., Ltd) | LUNR (Intuitive Machines, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -12.5% | +80.0% |
| 5-year return | -100.0% | +67.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 145.7% | 109.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.85 | 3.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -98.4% | -75.1% |
| Market cap | – | $2.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | IFBD | LUNR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -88.9% | +3.7% |
| 2023 | -97.8% | -74.4% |
| 2024 | -78.4% | +610.8% |
| 2025 | -57.9% | -10.6% |
| 2026 | -4.3% | -0.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are IFBD and LUNR good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between IFBD and LUNR?
The IFBD/LUNR correlation stands at 0.39 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.05, 5 years: 0.34), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is LUNR a good diversifier for IFBD?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?
A reading of 0.39 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ifbd-vs-lunr.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ifbd-vs-lunr/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: IFBD correlations · LUNR correlations
