PairBook
HomeICLN › ICLN vs STK

ICLN vs STK: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund Inc (STK) carry a correlation of 0.57, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.57
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.73
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.56
long-run
Ann. covariance
359.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ICLN and STK?

On 3 years of weekly data the ICLN/STK correlation comes out at 0.57, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.73) than the 3-year average (0.57). The 5-year figure is 0.56, and annualized covariance runs at 359.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, STK places #12 of the 78 assets tracked against ICLN. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with STK ahead by 51.2 points (+25.6% versus +76.8%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ICLN vs STK: side by side

ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF)STK (Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund Inc)
1-year return+25.6%+76.8%
5-year return-18.4%+153.2%
Volatility (ann.)24.0%26.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.781.51
Max drawdown (3Y)-34.6%-26.6%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)5.9
Dividend yield1.05%0.00%
Expense ratio0.39%
Assets under management$2.3B
Sector / categoryETF · ThematicUS Listed
Higher yield: ICLN 1.05% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: STK -26.6% vs -34.6%Higher 5y return: STK +153.2% vs -18.4%

On the fund side, ICLN sits in the Miscellaneous Sector category at iShares, with $2.3B under management, 102 holdings, a 0.39% expense ratio, a 1.05% trailing dividend yield.

0%0%+83%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ICLN · STK

Year-by-year returns

YearICLNSTK
2022-5.4%-30.4%
2023-20.4%+49.2%
2024-25.7%+17.7%
2025+47.0%+24.9%
2026+8.8%+47.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ICLN and STK good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.57 means ICLN and STK share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ICLN and STK?

The ICLN/STK correlation stands at 0.57 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.73, 5 years: 0.56), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is STK a good diversifier for ICLN?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.57 means ICLN and STK share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.57 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.57 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/icln-vs-stk.json

ICLN vs STK: 3-year weekly correlation 0.57ICLN vs STK0.57

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ICLN vs STK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/icln-vs-stk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/icln-vs-stk/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ICLN correlations · STK correlations