PairBook
HomeICFI › ICFI vs PULM

ICFI vs PULM: Correlation

ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) and Pulmatrix, Inc. (PULM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1286.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ICFI and PULM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ICFI and PULM correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.18) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.24). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.17, with an annualized covariance of -1286.2 %².

PULM is close to the least connected end of ICFI's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 13. The last year tells two different stories: ICFI led by 59.3 percentage points, -9.4% for ICFI against -68.7% for PULM. One caveat on sizing: PULM is 3.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ICFI vs PULM: side by side

ICFI (ICF International, Inc.)PULM (Pulmatrix, Inc.)
1-year return-9.4%-68.7%
5-year return-2.1%-90.6%
Volatility (ann.)37.8%144.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.60-0.18
Max drawdown (3Y)-65.6%-88.1%
Market cap$1.6B
P/E (trailing)18.4
Dividend yield0.63%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: ICFI 0.63% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ICFI -65.6% vs -88.1%Higher 5y return: ICFI -2.1% vs -90.6%
-75%0%+4%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ICFI · PULM

Year-by-year returns

YearICFIPULM
2022-2.9%-55.7%
2023+36.0%-52.1%
2024-10.8%+275.3%
2025-28.0%-68.1%
2026+5.7%-31.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ICFI and PULM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ICFI and PULM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ICFI and PULM is -0.24 over 3 years, 0.18 over 1 year and -0.17 over 5 years.

Is PULM a good diversifier for ICFI?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/icfi-vs-pulm.json

ICFI vs PULM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24ICFI vs PULM-0.24

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ICFI vs PULM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/icfi-vs-pulm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/icfi-vs-pulm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ICFI correlations · PULM correlations