PairBook
HomeICCM › ICCM vs VLO

ICCM vs VLO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, IceCure Medical Ltd. (ICCM) and Valero Energy (VLO) carry a correlation of -0.19, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.20
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-765.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ICCM and VLO?

Over the past 3 years, ICCM and VLO moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.20) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.12, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -765.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, VLO places #15 of the 41 assets tracked against ICCM. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VLO outperformed by 227.1 percentage points (-92.3% for ICCM against +134.8% for VLO). Note the risk asymmetry: ICCM runs 3.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ICCM vs VLO: side by side

ICCM (IceCure Medical Ltd.)VLO (Valero Energy)
1-year return-92.3%+134.8%
5-year return-99.3%+512.9%
Volatility (ann.)117.6%34.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.410.55
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.4%-41.2%
Market cap$99.8B
P/E (trailing)14.5
Dividend yield0.00%1.34%
Sector / categoryUS ListedEnergy
Higher yield: VLO 1.34% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: VLO -41.2% vs -95.4%Higher 5y return: VLO +512.9% vs -99.3%
-93%0%+127%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ICCM · VLO

Year-by-year returns

YearICCMVLO
2022-49.2%+75.0%
2023-31.0%+5.9%
2024+2.8%-3.0%
2025-44.5%+37.0%
2026-87.5%+116.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ICCM and VLO good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ICCM and VLO?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ICCM and VLO is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.20 over 1 year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is VLO a good diversifier for ICCM?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iccm-vs-vlo.json

ICCM vs VLO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19ICCM vs VLO-0.19

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ICCM vs VLO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iccm-vs-vlo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iccm-vs-vlo/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ICCM correlations · VLO correlations