PairBook
HomeICCM › ICCM vs UNP

ICCM vs UNP: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, IceCure Medical Ltd. (ICCM) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) carry a correlation of -0.17, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-420.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ICCM and UNP?

On 3 years of weekly data the ICCM/UNP correlation comes out at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.36) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.17). The 5-year figure is -0.10, and annualized covariance runs at -420.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, UNP places #11 of the 41 assets tracked against ICCM. The last year tells two different stories: UNP led by 134.7 percentage points, -92.3% for ICCM against +42.4% for UNP. Risk is not evenly split, since ICCM carries 5.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ICCM vs UNP: side by side

ICCM (IceCure Medical Ltd.)UNP (Union Pacific Corporation)
1-year return-92.3%+42.4%
5-year return-99.3%+56.5%
Volatility (ann.)117.6%20.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.410.56
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.4%-17.8%
Market cap$182.8B
P/E (trailing)25.1
Dividend yield0.00%1.78%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: UNP 1.78% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: UNP -17.8% vs -95.4%Higher 5y return: UNP +56.5% vs -99.3%
-93%0%+42%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ICCM · UNP

Year-by-year returns

YearICCMUNP
2022-49.2%-15.9%
2023-31.0%+21.6%
2024+2.8%-5.1%
2025-44.5%+3.9%
2026-87.5%+34.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ICCM and UNP good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ICCM and UNP?

The ICCM/UNP correlation stands at -0.17 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.36, 5 years: -0.10), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is UNP a good diversifier for ICCM?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

A reading of -0.17 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iccm-vs-unp.json

ICCM vs UNP: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17ICCM vs UNP-0.17

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ICCM vs UNP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iccm-vs-unp.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iccm-vs-unp/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ICCM correlations · UNP correlations