PairBook
HomeICCM › ICCM vs TRGP

ICCM vs TRGP: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, IceCure Medical Ltd. (ICCM) and Targa Resources (TRGP) carry a correlation of -0.19, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-708.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ICCM and TRGP?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ICCM and TRGP correlate at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.24 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.10, with an annualized covariance of -708.7 %².

Within ICCM's tracked universe of 41 assets, TRGP comes in at #14 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: TRGP led by 171.0 percentage points, -92.3% for ICCM against +78.7% for TRGP. Note the risk asymmetry: ICCM runs 3.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ICCM vs TRGP: side by side

ICCM (IceCure Medical Ltd.)TRGP (Targa Resources)
1-year return-92.3%+78.7%
5-year return-99.3%+626.8%
Volatility (ann.)117.6%31.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.410.44
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.4%-31.6%
Market cap$62.0B
P/E (trailing)28.1
Dividend yield0.00%1.53%
Sector / categoryUS ListedEnergy
Higher yield: TRGP 1.53% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TRGP -31.6% vs -95.4%Higher 5y return: TRGP +626.8% vs -99.3%
-93%0%+88%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ICCM · TRGP

Year-by-year returns

YearICCMTRGP
2022-49.2%+43.7%
2023-31.0%+21.0%
2024+2.8%+110.1%
2025-44.5%+5.7%
2026-87.5%+58.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ICCM and TRGP good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ICCM and TRGP?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ICCM and TRGP is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.24 over 1 year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is TRGP a good diversifier for ICCM?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iccm-vs-trgp.json

ICCM vs TRGP: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19ICCM vs TRGP-0.19

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ICCM vs TRGP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iccm-vs-trgp.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iccm-vs-trgp/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ICCM correlations · TRGP correlations