PairBook
HomeICCM › ICCM vs SLB

ICCM vs SLB: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, IceCure Medical Ltd. (ICCM) and Schlumberger (SLB) carry a correlation of -0.26, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1059.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ICCM and SLB?

On 3 years of weekly data the ICCM/SLB correlation comes out at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.42) than the 3-year average (-0.26). The 5-year figure is -0.15, and annualized covariance runs at -1059.3 %².

Among the 41 assets we track against ICCM, SLB sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #37. The last year tells two different stories: SLB led by 149.4 percentage points, -92.3% for ICCM against +57.1% for SLB. Note the risk asymmetry: ICCM runs 3.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ICCM vs SLB: side by side

ICCM (IceCure Medical Ltd.)SLB (Schlumberger)
1-year return-92.3%+57.1%
5-year return-99.3%+117.1%
Volatility (ann.)117.6%35.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.410.57
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.4%-46.6%
Market cap$81.6B
P/E (trailing)26.2
Dividend yield0.00%2.16%
Sector / categoryUS ListedEnergy
Higher yield: SLB 2.16% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SLB -46.6% vs -95.4%Higher 5y return: SLB +117.1% vs -99.3%
-93%0%+62%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ICCM · SLB

Year-by-year returns

YearICCMSLB
2022-49.2%+81.2%
2023-31.0%-0.8%
2024+2.8%-24.5%
2025-44.5%+3.3%
2026-87.5%+44.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ICCM and SLB good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.26, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ICCM and SLB?

The ICCM/SLB correlation stands at -0.26 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.42, 5 years: -0.15), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SLB a good diversifier for ICCM?

Yes: at -0.26, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iccm-vs-slb.json

ICCM vs SLB: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26ICCM vs SLB-0.26

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ICCM vs SLB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iccm-vs-slb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iccm-vs-slb/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ICCM correlations · SLB correlations