PairBook
HomeICCM › ICCM vs PBT

ICCM vs PBT: Correlation

IceCure Medical Ltd. (ICCM) and Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.26.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1213.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ICCM and PBT?

Over the past 3 years, ICCM and PBT moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.32) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.07, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1213.8 %².

Among the 41 assets we track against ICCM, PBT ranks #36 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with PBT ahead by 200.7 points (-92.3% versus +108.4%). Risk is not evenly split, since ICCM carries 3.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ICCM vs PBT: side by side

ICCM (IceCure Medical Ltd.)PBT (Permian Basin Royalty Trust)
1-year return-92.3%+108.4%
5-year return-99.3%+669.6%
Volatility (ann.)117.6%39.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.410.48
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.4%-57.6%
Market cap$1.6B
P/E (trailing)96.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.81%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: PBT 0.81% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PBT -57.6% vs -95.4%Higher 5y return: PBT +669.6% vs -99.3%
-93%0%+94%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ICCM · PBT

Year-by-year returns

YearICCMPBT
2022-49.2%+166.2%
2023-31.0%-42.8%
2024+2.8%-16.9%
2025-44.5%+56.6%
2026-87.5%+100.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ICCM and PBT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ICCM and PBT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.26 over 3 years, with -0.32 over the last year and -0.07 over 5 years.

Is PBT a good diversifier for ICCM?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iccm-vs-pbt.json

ICCM vs PBT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26ICCM vs PBT-0.26

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ICCM vs PBT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iccm-vs-pbt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iccm-vs-pbt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ICCM correlations · PBT correlations