PairBook
HomeIBAC › IBAC vs NAK

IBAC vs NAK: Correlation

IB Acquisition Corp. (IBAC) and Northern Dynasty Minerals, Ltd. (NAK) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-53.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IBAC and NAK?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of IBAC and NAK correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.28) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -53.6 %².

Within IBAC's tracked universe of 62 assets, NAK comes in at #37 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: NAK led by 93.3 percentage points, +3.3% for IBAC against +96.6% for NAK. Note the risk asymmetry: NAK runs 46.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IBAC vs NAK: side by side

IBAC (IB Acquisition Corp.)NAK (Northern Dynasty Minerals, Ltd.)
1-year return+3.3%+96.6%
5-year returnn/a+326.8%
Volatility (ann.)2.1%96.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.001.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-3.2%-67.8%
Market cap$0.1B$1.0B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: IBAC -3.2% vs -67.8%
-4%0%+176%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. IBAC · NAK

Year-by-year returns

YearIBACNAK
2022-33.3%
2023+45.5%
2024+81.2%
2025+3.7%+239.7%
2026+3.7%-11.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IBAC and NAK good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IBAC and NAK?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between IBAC and NAK is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.28 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is NAK a good diversifier for IBAC?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ibac-vs-nak.json

IBAC vs NAK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25IBAC vs NAK-0.25

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![IBAC vs NAK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ibac-vs-nak.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ibac-vs-nak/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IBAC correlations · NAK correlations