PairBook
HomeIBAC › IBAC vs MNTK

IBAC vs MNTK: Correlation

IB Acquisition Corp. (IBAC) and Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.26.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.27
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-37.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IBAC and MNTK?

On 3 years of weekly data the IBAC/MNTK correlation comes out at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.27 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -37.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, MNTK places #41 of the 62 assets tracked against IBAC. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with IBAC ahead by 21.1 points (+3.3% versus -17.8%). Note the risk asymmetry: MNTK runs 35.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IBAC vs MNTK: side by side

IBAC (IB Acquisition Corp.)MNTK (Montauk Renewables, Inc.)
1-year return+3.3%-17.8%
5-year returnn/a-78.7%
Volatility (ann.)2.1%74.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.001.62
Max drawdown (3Y)-3.2%-89.6%
Market cap$0.1B$0.3B
P/E (trailing)36.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: IBAC -3.2% vs -89.6%
-45%0%+20%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. IBAC · MNTK

Year-by-year returns

YearIBACMNTK
2022+7.6%
2023-19.2%
2024-55.3%
2025+3.7%-58.0%
2026+3.7%+7.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IBAC and MNTK good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, IBAC and MNTK have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IBAC and MNTK?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between IBAC and MNTK is -0.26 over 3 years, -0.27 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MNTK a good diversifier for IBAC?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, IBAC and MNTK have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

A reading of -0.26 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ibac-vs-mntk.json

IBAC vs MNTK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26IBAC vs MNTK-0.26

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![IBAC vs MNTK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ibac-vs-mntk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ibac-vs-mntk/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IBAC correlations · MNTK correlations