PairBook
HomeIAF › IAF vs VT

IAF vs VT: Correlation

abrdn Australia Equity Fund, Inc. (IAF) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.78.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.78
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.78
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.75
long-run
Ann. covariance
201.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IAF and VT?

On 3 years of weekly data the IAF/VT correlation comes out at 0.78, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.78 over 1 year against 0.78 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.75, and annualized covariance runs at 201.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, VT places #4 of the 14 assets tracked against IAF. Over the last 12 months VT came out ahead by 13.7 percentage points (+9.0% against +22.7%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IAF vs VT: side by side

IAF (abrdn Australia Equity Fund, Inc.)VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF)
1-year return+9.0%+22.7%
5-year return+23.6%+67.7%
Volatility (ann.)18.6%13.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.880.92
Max drawdown (3Y)-23.6%-16.5%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)7.7
Dividend yield10.76%1.59%
Expense ratio0.06%
Assets under management$97.9B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · Global
Higher yield: IAF 10.76% vs 1.59%Smaller drawdown: VT -16.5% vs -23.6%Higher 5y return: VT +67.7% vs +23.6%

VT is a Global Large-Stock Blend fund from Vanguard: $97.9B under management, 5308 holdings, a 0.06% expense ratio, a 1.59% trailing dividend yield.

-8%0%+23%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). IAF · VT

Year-by-year returns

YearIAFVT
2022-19.4%-18.0%
2023+10.4%+22.0%
2024+8.2%+16.5%
2025+14.9%+22.4%
2026+12.6%+15.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IAF and VT good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.78 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IAF and VT?

The IAF/VT correlation stands at 0.78 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.78, 5 years: 0.75), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VT a good diversifier for IAF?

To a limited degree. At 0.78 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.78 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.78 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iaf-vs-vt.json

IAF vs VT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.78IAF vs VT0.78

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![IAF vs VT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iaf-vs-vt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iaf-vs-vt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IAF correlations · VT correlations