PairBook
HomeIA › IA vs LONA

IA vs LONA: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (IA) and LeonaBio, Inc. (LONA) carry a correlation of 0.35, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.35
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.54
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.28
long-run
Ann. covariance
2438.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IA and LONA?

Over the past 3 years, IA and LONA moved with a correlation of 0.35, which is moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.54) runs above the 3-year figure (0.35). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.28, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 2438.5 %².

LONA is one of the assets that tracks IA most closely: it ranks #3 out of the 10 assets we track against IA. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LONA ahead by 39.5 points (+57.7% versus +97.2%). Note the risk asymmetry: LONA runs 1.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IA vs LONA: side by side

IA (Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.)LONA (LeonaBio, Inc.)
1-year return+57.7%+97.2%
5-year return+202.0%-92.6%
Volatility (ann.)67.2%104.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.211.80
Max drawdown (3Y)-57.8%-94.5%
Market cap$0.4B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)20.4
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: IA -57.8% vs -94.5%Higher 5y return: IA +202.0% vs -92.6%
-26%0%+191%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. IA · LONA

Year-by-year returns

YearIALONA
2022+25.3%-75.7%
2023+3.8%-23.3%
2024+0.1%-75.8%
2025+121.8%+29.0%
2026+11.8%+4.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IA and LONA good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.35, IA and LONA keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IA and LONA?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.35 over 3 years, with 0.54 over the last year and 0.28 over 5 years.

Is LONA a good diversifier for IA?

Reasonably. At 0.35, IA and LONA keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.35 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ia-vs-lona.json

IA vs LONA: 3-year weekly correlation 0.35IA vs LONA0.35

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![IA vs LONA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ia-vs-lona.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ia-vs-lona/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IA correlations · LONA correlations