PairBook
HomeHYG › HYG vs LQD

HYG vs LQD: Correlation

iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.72.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.72
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.75
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.71
long-run
Ann. covariance
24.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HYG and LQD?

Over the past 3 years, HYG and LQD moved with a correlation of 0.72, which is strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.75 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.71, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 24.5 %².

Among the 46 assets we track against HYG, LQD ranks #17 by 3-year correlation. Neither side won the trailing year by much: +4.6% against +1.5%. The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.43 and 0.83 over the past three years, a moderate range. One caveat on sizing: LQD is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HYG vs LQD: side by side

HYG (iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF)LQD (iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF)
1-year return+4.6%+1.5%
5-year return+19.9%-4.1%
Volatility (ann.)4.7%7.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.220.15
Max drawdown (3Y)-4.6%-6.7%
Dividend yield5.94%4.66%
Expense ratio0.49%0.14%
Assets under management$17.1B$33.0B
Sector / categoryETF · BondsETF · Bonds
Lower fee: LQD 0.14% vs 0.49%Higher yield: HYG 5.94% vs 4.66%Smaller drawdown: HYG -4.6% vs -6.7%Higher 5y return: HYG +19.9% vs -4.1%

HYG, iShares's High Yield Bond fund, carries $17.1B under management, a 0.49% expense ratio, a 5.94% trailing dividend yield. LQD, iShares's Corporate Bond fund, carries $33.0B under management, a 0.14% expense ratio, a 4.66% trailing dividend yield.

-1%0%+4%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. HYG · LQD

Year-by-year returns

YearHYGLQD
2022-11.0%-17.9%
2023+11.5%+9.4%
2024+8.0%+0.9%
2025+8.6%+7.9%
2026+2.5%-0.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HYG and LQD good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.72 means HYG and LQD share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HYG and LQD?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.72 over 3 years, with 0.75 over the last year and 0.71 over 5 years.

Is LQD a good diversifier for HYG?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.72 means HYG and LQD share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.72 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hyg-vs-lqd.json

HYG vs LQD: 3-year weekly correlation 0.72HYG vs LQD0.72

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![HYG vs LQD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hyg-vs-lqd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hyg-vs-lqd/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HYG correlations · LQD correlations