PairBook
HomeHWC › HWC vs USB

HWC vs USB: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) and U.S. Bancorp (USB) carry a correlation of 0.83, a very strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.83
very strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.78
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.78
long-run
Ann. covariance
691.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HWC and USB?

On 3 years of weekly data the HWC/USB correlation comes out at 0.83, very strong, meaning they move nearly in lockstep. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.78 over 1 year against 0.83 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.78, and annualized covariance runs at 691.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, USB places #21 of the 34 assets tracked against HWC. Over the last 12 months USB came out ahead by 11.5 percentage points (+21.6% against +33.1%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HWC vs USB: side by side

HWC (Hancock Whitney Corporation)USB (U.S. Bancorp)
1-year return+21.6%+33.1%
5-year return+89.0%+36.0%
Volatility (ann.)30.7%27.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.031.09
Max drawdown (3Y)-23.9%-30.6%
Market cap$6.0B$97.2B
P/E (trailing)14.712.5
Dividend yield2.53%3.31%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Lower P/E: USB 12.5 vs 14.7Higher yield: USB 3.31% vs 2.53%Smaller drawdown: HWC -23.9% vs -30.6%Higher 5y return: HWC +89.0% vs +36.0%
-12%0%+39%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). HWC · USB

Year-by-year returns

YearHWCUSB
2022-1.2%-19.1%
2023+3.3%+4.8%
2024+16.1%+15.6%
2025+20.0%+16.5%
2026+19.5%+19.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HWC and USB good diversifiers for each other?

No. With a correlation of 0.83, HWC and USB move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HWC and USB?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.83 over 3 years, with 0.78 over the last year and 0.78 over 5 years.

Is USB a good diversifier for HWC?

No. With a correlation of 0.83, HWC and USB move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

What does a correlation of 0.83 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hwc-vs-usb.json

HWC vs USB: 3-year weekly correlation 0.83HWC vs USB0.83

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![HWC vs USB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hwc-vs-usb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hwc-vs-usb/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HWC correlations · USB correlations