PairBook
HomeHUM › HUM vs XLV

HUM vs XLV: Correlation

How closely do Humana (HUM) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.31, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.31
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.37
long-run
Ann. covariance
199.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HUM and XLV?

On 3 years of weekly data the HUM/XLV correlation comes out at 0.31, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.28 over 1 year against 0.31 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.37, and annualized covariance runs at 199.9 %².

Within HUM's tracked universe of 30 assets, XLV comes in at #17 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives HUM the advantage: +34.0% versus +27.5%, a 6.5-point spread. Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.10 to 0.55. Risk is not evenly split, since HUM carries 2.9 times the volatility of the other side.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HUM vs XLV: side by side

HUM (Humana)XLV (Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+34.0%+27.5%
5-year return+1.8%+37.4%
Volatility (ann.)43.3%14.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.520.42
Max drawdown (3Y)-67.9%-17.1%
Market cap$47.1B
P/E (trailing)36.9
Dividend yield0.91%1.56%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$41.7B
Sector / categoryHealth CareSector ETF
Higher yield: XLV 1.56% vs 0.91%Smaller drawdown: XLV -17.1% vs -67.9%Higher 5y return: XLV +37.4% vs +1.8%

On the fund side, XLV sits in the Health category at State Street Investment Management, with $41.7B under management, 61 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 1.56% trailing dividend yield.

-46%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. HUM · XLV

Year-by-year returns

YearHUMXLV
2022+11.2%-2.1%
2023-9.9%+2.1%
2024-44.0%+2.5%
2025+2.4%+14.5%
2026+54.4%+11.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

Keep in mind that XLV holds HUM at a 0.75% weight, which makes a slice of this correlation mechanical rather than coincidental.

Are HUM and XLV good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.31 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HUM and XLV?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between HUM and XLV is 0.31 over 3 years, 0.28 over 1 year and 0.37 over 5 years.

Is XLV a good diversifier for HUM?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.31 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.31 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hum-vs-xlv.json

HUM vs XLV: 3-year weekly correlation 0.31HUM vs XLV0.31

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![HUM vs XLV correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hum-vs-xlv.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hum-vs-xlv/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HUM correlations · XLV correlations