PairBook
HomeHUM › HUM vs KXIN

HUM vs KXIN: Correlation

Humana (HUM) and Kaixin Holdings (KXIN) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.21
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2312.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HUM and KXIN?

Over the past 3 years, HUM and KXIN moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.21) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.20). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.17, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2312.5 %².

Among the 30 assets we track against HUM, KXIN ranks #24 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months HUM outperformed by 133.5 percentage points (+34.0% for HUM against -99.5% for KXIN). Risk is not evenly split, since KXIN carries 6.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HUM vs KXIN: side by side

HUM (Humana)KXIN (Kaixin Holdings)
1-year return+34.0%-99.5%
5-year return+1.8%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)43.3%272.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.522.71
Max drawdown (3Y)-67.9%-100.0%
Market cap$47.1B
P/E (trailing)36.9
Dividend yield0.91%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Higher yield: HUM 0.91% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: HUM -67.9% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: HUM +1.8% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+160%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). HUM · KXIN

Year-by-year returns

YearHUMKXIN
2022+11.2%-74.3%
2023-9.9%-80.0%
2024-44.0%-97.1%
2025+2.4%-88.6%
2026+54.4%-98.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HUM and KXIN good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HUM and KXIN?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between HUM and KXIN is -0.20 over 3 years, 0.21 over 1 year and -0.17 over 5 years.

Is KXIN a good diversifier for HUM?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hum-vs-kxin.json

HUM vs KXIN: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20HUM vs KXIN-0.20

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![HUM vs KXIN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hum-vs-kxin.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hum-vs-kxin/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HUM correlations · KXIN correlations